This is going to be a fun one.

So here are the facts:

I commented on a news article about a mother and adult son charged with incest (and adultery as well for her.) This is what I said:

Someone responded to me and I replied before I realized my original comment was removed for being inappropriate. Then I added the edit when I saw.

The next day I discovered I’d been banned from that community for “pro-incest comments” and several others I don’t think I’ve ever been in for rule 4 violations. The orignal post was removed.

You can see those here:

Site rule 4 is: Usernames or posts/comments containing transphobia, homophobia, sexism, racism, ableism, zionism, anti-veganism, or trivializing COVID. No self-described or obvious fascists, conservatives, or reactionaries.

My comments had none of those things. I’d even go so far as to say my banning was reactionary.

Now, I’m not defending incest, especially not for myself. My problem is with puritanical laws interfering with the private sex lives of people. In my original comment I stated that grooming was a separate issue and should be dealt with, but that there is nothing inherently wrong with incest. That is, enthusiastic consensual sex between capable adults.

I know someone will bring up the Hapsburgs, so yes, children of incest should be avoided.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Like I said you keep saying that when you have a question you can’t answer and maintain your bullshit.

      Should I point out in California there is no minimum age to marry and after marriage there is no statutory rape?

      It’s gross to defend removing them bud.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, except the person you’re defending. You’re adorable, tell me to have a nice day and then continue the conversation one more time, it’ll be our thing.