• Uruanna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t know what other slop OP may have posted but I’m pretty sure this particular image existed before AI. Slow down and check what YOU do.

      • TootSweet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Screenshot of Tineye finding zero results for the OP image.

        My DuckDuckGo image search-fu also hasn’t found any references to that image before March 2026.

        Are you saying you’re “pretty sure this particular image existed before AI” from memory or something else?

        • Uruanna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          From memory yes. I can’t find the image, but the discussion of dinosaurs getting lifted by tornados can be seen seriously (with finger quotes) asked “to scientists” on multiple forums (Facebook, WordPress sites, quora…) from 10 to 12 years ago, so the joke was making the rounds.

          I do see the “less than 6 months old” resurgence of that image, extended with extra shit on the side that was clearly added much more recently my dumb, so that may be why you’re seeing it as slop, I’m guessing someone revived it with that slop.

          ETA: this one is from 2023 and it’s the extended version, so not AI touch up either after all. Also has the artist name, Douglas Henderson, and it is in fact vintage art. So yeah, easy on the AI false positive.

          Edit again: looking at a bigger screen, OP might have an upscaled version, but that’s less surprising.

          • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            the fact that the threshold for slop/not slop detection is primarily based on how recently the image was created is discouraging.

    • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      3 days ago

      I appreciate it, but I’m honestly sick of the slop police.

      I don’t like the idea of being tricked by AI either, nor the impact AI has on the environment, but I the slop police everywhere, and don’t add much to the conversation. The whole thing is generally tiring.

      Pointing out ‘hey bro, this is AI’ and still discussing the post would be a better approach in my book. Not all doctored images are slop either - Photoshop exists and was how shitposts were made for a really long time. We still discussed those posts, and how silly they were.

      • TootSweet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’m honestly sick of the slop police.

        Then keep slop in pro-GenAI echo chambers.

        (Or if it isn’t slop, bring evidence.)

        The option to “opt out” of slop has been deliberately denied us by the whole god-damned GenAI grift industry. The only way we have to opt out of slop is to shame those who spread it.

        • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I get your point, and honestly, it’s a fair one. I’m not pro slop, and I state that above.

          By inundating the web with slop, AI proponents have made it really hard to post/share stuff that’s not slop.

          I am, however, a shtiposter. I’ve got 4500 posts over 3.3 years. I’m simply not going to verify everything I post isnt AI. As I said, I do check usually, but theres a lack of tools to do so, and the ones that are out there that I’ve found are checks notes AI, which defeats the purpose. If you have good tools, paste them here and I’ll start using them. I’m not going on a fucking Goose hunt each time I share a meme, though.

          • TootSweet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            shtiposter

            slop ≠ shit

            I’m simply not going to verify everything I post isnt AI.

            Then expect the same reaction frequently.

            the [tools] that are out there that I’ve found are checks notes AI

            Yeah, those aren’t reliable and I wouldn’t advocate for their use.

            If you have good tools, paste them here and I’ll start using them

            Tineye and DuckDuckGo image search.

            I’m not going on a fucking Goose hunt each time I share a meme, though.

            “When in doubt, don’t post it” is always an option.

            • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Tineye and DuckDuckGo image search. using their equivalents already, but I guess I can try those ones specifically.

              Then expect the same reaction frequently. You do you. Half the time I don’t even read the comments on my posts.

              We clearly have different viewpoints, and that’s fine, but continuing on isn’t productive. Thanks, at least, for sharing your perspective. I legitimately hope you have a good rest of your day.

      • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        but I’m honestly sick of the slop police.

        I’m getting sick of all the AI slop.

        Don’t post slop and you won’t have to deal with slop police ;)

        • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          I try to avoid it, and do some checks where I can’t but some stuff still trickles through given how much I post.

          While I agree with your stance in the broadest terms, I think you’re fighting a losing battle, just given how fast slop can be turned out and how wide spread it is already.

          • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Just stop posting slop. It isn’t that hard.

            I think you’re fighting a losing battle

            So that’s a good reason to add to the problem? Maybe post less but better quality, instead of high quantity slop. The entire problem with the enshitification of the internet is the vast quantity of people posting so much unverified fake news, slop and other junk. There is no excuse for doing this. Just fucking stop being the problem.

      • Demdaru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Counterpoint: Not adding much to conversation is the point. Don’t feed the troll. Don’t eat the slop. For real convo use real things not corrupted by slopmachines.