COLOURS ARE FUCKING COLOURS. WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING, FRANCE?!

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    It is the same word

    Edit: i still understand being puzzled by this, but the thing is, learning a language partially forces you to learn how the native speakers think… i would even argue that is the final milestone on learning a language.

    Spanish found a way to supress the subject from it’s sentences

    Germans speak as if they were assembling a puzzle

    Japanese looks like a programming language… pretty neat

    Russian has two different plurals and the quantity that makes a word fall in the first one or the second one is “arbitrary”.

    I know this looks like a gigantic mountain to climb, but i assure you that as you advance, things will progressively make more sense

    spoiler

    That does not apply to the numbers… it feels like a toddler forgot how to count and started making up shit. What really bothers me is not that but the amiguity… 4 20 sounds exactly as 80

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Estonians found a way to communicate without sex, future, articles or prepositions. Oh, sounds like a super easy language to learn with fewer things in it, right? Fuck you, we have 14 cases so we could tell foreigners from native speakers by how they confuse genitive and partitive, two of the most basic cases. And then most cities, towns, villages you’d go to use illative (“into”) to say “I’m going to X”, but some will be allative (“onto”) and there’s no rule for it, so people from other parts of the country might not know it and it’ll sound super weird.

      And I still find English to be the weird language. Just look at the different words written as “lead”. Why are they pronounced so differently?! Nothing is pronounced as written.

    • Peacepath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It is not an ambiguity, it is a remaining from a popular way to count. Just as you may count per hundreds and 4 100 sounds like 400, and means it. But you may also count things by dozen (most likely for eggs…).

      Yet you may use “octante” (beligum) or “huitante” (swiss) instead of “quatre-vingt”.

      • Siegfried@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You are right… i never paid attention to it cause spanish does not have this until 1000

        4 (cuatro), 100 (cien), 400 (cuatrocientos)

        4, 1000 (mil), 4000 (cuatromil)

        Thanks, this helps me