My three kids are in their 20’s. Assuming there are no weapons involved, I’d say they’re safe with any of them.
Bin Laden, Hitler, and Combs would each have a rough night. Lindsay would probably be ok. If necessary, they could restrain her without injuring her.
Uncle Adi for sure. Osama would be secod pick.
I don’t know who top left is, but I reckon Bin Laden’s the safe bet here
Tbh the biggest danger that would come from having bin Laden babysit your kids is the possibility of them being killed in a drone strike.
Hmm. I think Adolf was not bad to children (or maybe I am missing some information) and debating him would be fun for me, too.
Arabs are usually too patriotic and uninterested in children. Diddy is too diddly. And no idea who top left is.
Hitler or Bin Laden. They’re both dead, so what can they do? Also, I don’t have kids.
Just leave them home alone.
Alternatively, you reckon Osama could teach them basic engineering skills? If they are making phone-activated landmines surely they can put up some fun RF experiments.
He’s also great at hide-and-seek.
Hwo is on top left and bottom right?
Osama bin Laden loved his kids. He was hard on them, for sure, he was basically what you imagine when you think of a deep south US prepper survivalist - a bit eccentric and paranoid, but intelligent - he would be taking his kids on long hikes, teaching them how to sleep in the desert with only sand as a blanket, but he did it out of a deep desire to protect them and give them skills to survive.
deep south US prepper survivalist
intelligent
sorry, you lost me there
That’s an easy choice. Bin Laden wasn’t even that bad of a guy.
We’re not actually reposting incel memes on Lemmy, are we?
If they have blonde hair and blue eyes, uncle Adolf is the safest bet.
Bin Laden unless you have twins.
Got me good. Thanks!
ngl, since im a white, cis, heterosexual, non-jewish, german: probably hitler. i dont think he was the kinda guy that would kill children just because he could. if these children happened to have like, a jewish mother, things would definitely look different
Tbh, I don’t know who the lady is
I think that’s the lady currently on trial for murdering her three kids.
Now I know, and
trial is over. she will likely have another trial. we won’t know until end of Sept when the next hearing for her case is set.
it’s possible a plea deal could be offered, but unlikely.
‘we have had the trial, yes. but what about the second one?’
Woman who recently had a mistrial go viral for being the latest influencer courtroom case. Similar to Depp v Heard. The woman’s name is Lindsay Clancy, I believe.
Notable things (viewing this through the lens of my wife who told me about this case):
- flimsy hard evidence against the mother
- mother allegedly tried to kill herself 3 different ways after snapping and allegedly killing her children while the husband was out of the house
- a lot of the evidence seemed to be hearsay from the husband
- children’s bodies were cremated by the father
- father is suspected of having a mistress because he moved on after this relatively quickly.
- jury trial ended in a hung jury, because 1 juror tried to reverse “12 Angry Men” it to get all other jurors to switch to a Guilty verdict.
- Clancy admitted to the murders initially
My unsolicited opinion is that she very likely did commit the crimes, but the State has insufficient evidence to convict due to the police’s negligence during their investigation.
The husband embezzled donations after skimping on the child’s gravestones.
He fucking set the whole thing up and is getting a free pass because this is what Americia stands for these days.
Lindsay Clancy
She admitted to the murders, but is pleading insanity.
also this guy is spreading lies. the evidence is clear she did it, and she confessed. there was no despute as to her guilt in murdering her children.
the issue is whether she can be held criminally liable for first degree murder. if the charges had been manslaughter or something else, it would have been a slam dunk conviction. but due to her mental state at the time, it’s questionable if she was capable/committed first degree, or premeditated, murder.
but people don’t want to talk about the legal issues in the case… they just want to push the emotional bullshit that she was absolutely innocent, or absolutely guilty, and there can’t be anything in-between. and lots and lots of people like the db0 user commenting here are spreading lies about the case to push their political agenda.
to the point that many of the TikTok moms who support her innocence are working entirely outside of the factual evidence of the case. which is also more evidence of how social media itself is causing psychosis in many folks, as it’s well-documented already how social media amplifies delusional and paranoid thinking.
I was pretty explicit, I think she did it and the state lacks evidence to convict beyond the shadow of doubt.
Sorry if the db0 in my username added some political leaning to my above post. I was trying to be pretty by the numbers as best as I knew.
I didn’t even mention the fact that there’s been a giant push for people to claim that the father committed the murders. It’s pretty far out there for claims.
I know another comment some issues with the way her specific state handles insanity pleas. Of that, I am not too in the know about. So I didn’t mention it.
I can switch to my Lemmy.World account if you prefer 😅
Fixed. Thanks! Problem with going off the cuff is I am terrible with names.
