• FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Sometimes it’s just not worth arguing with people. Certainly not if it’s the fifth time that week or something. That shit gets exhausting.

    Also, you’re allowed to simply not give a ahit on some things. We’ve all got our own shit do deal with without needing to form an informed opinion on every other thing that might be happening somewhwre in the world.

    • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      Yeah, when I say I don’t do politics, it’s not because I don’t care about the problems or they don’t affect me, it’s because I’m tired of talking about it, I have enough other shit in my life that’s stressing me out and it’s not going to do anything anyway.

  • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What do you guys think the best approach is when the apolitical person in question is a person of color, and the political one is the white fella?

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      The best approach is always the same.

      Be honest and kind, use logic and facts instead of propaganda and slogans, and realize that a lot of people don’t agree with you. Treat them with basic respect and civility regardless.

      For example, if you’re a Democrat, proceed with the knowledge that only 30% of your fellow voters are Democrats. The other 30% are Republicans, and remaining 40% are Independents.

      We all agree on some points and disagree on others; insulting 70% of the people around you isn’t going to do anything for you or your political objectives.

      To treat a “person of color” differently is racist, in my opinion. They’re not special.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If there were more two viable political parties, there would be a higher chance these people would find representation that they clearly lack.

  • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I’m starting to understand “I don’t do politics.” to often mean “I don’t have the mental aptitude for political discourse and have spent a significant amount of my life becoming educated on other subjects or otherwise being unintellectual about most subjects.” I feel it’s a little more acceptable that way. Some people are just not that smart or have not invested much time in politics or current world affairs. It usually means, they feel inadequate discussing the subject with you.

    • teslasaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      Teeny weenie bit hyperbolic, dont you think? By that logic, politicians are the greatest geniuses that ever walked the earth. People don’t bother with politics to avoid assholes that can’t shut up about it.

      • Jyek@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        I never said that at all… I said literally nothing about politicians and I said nothing to suggest it’s the most intelligent subject. You made that context up all on your own. I said that many people who don’t talk politics don’t for the exact same reason you might not talk about computers with someone who knows a lot about computers. You might also avoid conversation about gardening with someone who has kept gardens for years. It’s not necessarily because of a lack of intelligence (though in some cases it is) but most likely just not the subject matter they have the most knowledge of. Not everyone can spend the time immersing themselves in all the subject matter you have and politics is just another subject.

        • dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          To be fair it reads like you heavily correlate being political, to intellectual.

          By that logic more political = more intelligent.

          I understand you didn’t mean it that way, but it’s not hard to see why someone would assume that.

    • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Part of politics are like this. Like when you hear about people in white house doing terrible things. And you’re like who is this guy? “Oh he’s the secretary of defense.” What’s that mean? And soon it feels like if someone was trying to teach me about the people in Keeping up with the Kardashians. Or some other reality show.

      But then other ones are like…We are cutting funding for poor people and welfare. And that should be cut and dry.

    • Leviathan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They’re terrified that if they think about it too much or learn too much about it that they will have their mind changed and be alienated by their family/friends/communities.

      Some are just incredibly stupid, but I’d say most are just fucking cowards.

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You’re seeing fear and cowardice where there is none. Nobody is “scared” of learning about politics.

        To make such an assumption is… odd.

        So, why are you so afraid?

  • BananaLama@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m a believer that regardless of topic people sit on a bell curve where most people don’t really care

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      A few years ago I would have argued that something like pedophilia would have been something we could (mostly) all agree was bad, but republicans had to show me I was wrong.

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        … and Democrats! It’s not as if Biden opened the Epstein files.

        Epstein list is FULL of Democrats. He worked at Harvard… 99% Democrats… and so on. The list is full of Rs, too… but why are you only remembering them?

        Is there a reason you give all of those Ds a “pass” and pretend that they don’t exist? Curious.

        Personally, I think it’s disgusting. Shame on you.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The top orangutan has been accused of murdering babies and pregnant teens that he raped. So I would assume most of us Americans are unaffected since nobody is even investigating anything like that. Oh they investigated Cesar Chavez and there was much reason to do so and the biggest accuser was also part of the movement. But not the uber-rich. No siry Bob.

  • dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Man the same post on reddit is wild, people wanting to implement auto bans for people who are apolitical like somehow that will help.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    So glad all the time and effort everybody has been putting in to end the genocide in Gaza has finally paid off… and Trump was convicted, so glad he didn’t get a second term… and those Epstein files. Glad all those pedo’s are in jail or dead now.

    Sometimes you just gotta take a break from it all. The average citizen doesn’t have much power in small numbers. If some movement is gonna get big enough to actually effect change, you won’t miss it.

    • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      Referring to someone as “low iq” sounds exactly the same way it sounds when someone refers to a woman as “a female”