Fire in the hole!

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    11 days ago

    If we got all the other socialist progressive benefits of the Star Trek universe, including no billionaires, then I think we’d be a lot less unhappy with generative AI as presented in that world.

    How they built it, and what they plan to do with it is a pretty big part of the reason for our anger.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yeah, if we de-meme it and really want to define it, the difference is Star Trek is a post-scarcity world, so generative AI building things doesn’t take anything away from human artists - it doesn’t affect their livelihoods because their livelihoods are guaranteed.

      As always…

      • group_hug@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        We very nearly live in a post scarcity world too. Just all our resources and labor are funneled into the hands of a few wealthy billionaires.

        Star Trek is very Utopian. If it operated anything like our dystopian world it would have a lot of scarcity. For instance there is only one earth in Star Trek.

        In our timeline it is most billionaires goal to own the whole planet. Then after that 2 planets then hundreds of planets then 1000s of galaxies.

    • lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      Exactly! I am not anti-ai. I am opposed to corporate controlled, massively polluting, unreliable slop engines that will be used to surveil us and take our jobs without benefitting us in any way.

    • MrNesser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Depending on the rate of AI we will probably get something to the polity universe version than Star Trek.

      Still not as bad but could be better