• Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    the only way to have your privacy protected these days is to be in the epstien files.

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I have an old flat screen tv that I bought from Best Buy in 2011. It is just a tv, no internet, no Bluetooth, just a tv, I still have it and it works perfectly. I finally decided to get a smart tv last summer that POS broke within a year and just after the warranty expired.

  • bimbobear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Spent a few days in an AirBnB with all LGTV’s throughout the house. We never turned them on but today I go on Amazon and its now showing me adverts for the Airbed we briefly talked about in front of the TV -_-

    • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I repair arcade games and often mention to curious onlookers: “Fifty years of putting miniature particle accelerators in every home and business!”

    • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      CRTs had flatscreens beat until less than a decade ago, which was nearly 20 years after being replaced by society.

      Higher resolutions, refreshrates and lower latency until the 4k 250fps+ race began.

      However, i doubt there is much more to gain due to CRT being well into the end of the development S-curve.

  • sleepmode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t miss trying to figure out the often undocumented frequencies so X11 wouldn’t nuke them, and some CRTs were horrible, but games made for CRT on a nice Sony are like nothing else. I regret getting rid of my collection for a move.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah except CRTs had terrible resolution per price. Also CRTs asplode - was terrified of them setting the house on fire. Also they radiated. (Old joke that doesn’t translate well: They caused compli-, impli- and mutations). ALSO they’re not really manufactured anymore, so yeah!

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    “your TV needs to install an update, please connect to the internet”, it says

    how did it know it needed an update?

    I am 60% sure I have seen this happen IRL

  • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    CRTs did break. And they did suffer from burning.

    Just buy a non-smart modern TV, you won’t need a replacement and it won’t connect to the internet.

    • Logical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Please tell me where I can get a modern high-res TV that is NOT smart. I have tried but cannot find them anywhere

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Your best bet would be a commercial display. Though it’ll be double the price, at least, and you’ll need an hdmi switch and a soundbar more like as not.

  • Anchorxiety@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    3 days ago

    One advantage of modern TVs is how slim they are. It’s so crazy to me now how much space those old TVs took up. You just had a big TV stand sticking out from the wall.

    • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m using an old console TV that I’ve modified to hold a flat screen. I literally have a home server and a sound bar built into it the space that was originally just the tube and there’s still enough space for my full grown ass to climb inside.

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah, but you could use them as a shelf.

      Put stuff on top of them (just be careful when watering the plants).

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just in case anybody is stupid enough to believe this, there was nothing radioactive in old CRT-based TVs. And they sometimes had black cases but weren’t a “black box”.

    They worked by bending a beam of electrons that hit phosphors in the screen, which is cool enough that saying stupid BS about “radioactive” is unnecessary.

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      beam of electrons

      Let’s say it cooler: they were particle accelerators you pointed at your face.

      Also, massive glass vacuum bottles that could implode if mishandled.

      And with massive capacitors that could electrocute you if mishandled.

      And heavy enough to seriously crush your foot (and possibly implode and electrocute you) if mishandled.

      And the static electricity felt really neat on the back of your hand if you put it close to the screen.

      They were so fucking cool, and we took them for granted, and now they’re gone, and life is significantly less cool without them.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        But by fuck was their capacity to put out a clear image mid. But their screen size on the other hand …extremely limited

        • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          TVs, maybe¹. CRT monitors, though? They were great. And mostly didn’t care about what resolution you threw at them.

          1. It’s a big maybe, though. Live TV? Sure, but that was more on the extremely low resolution signal than on the screen (HDTV would’ve looked great on a CRT). But games? They were fantastic for games, though. Artists designed their images with CRT’s natural blur on mind, and now we need complex filters and at least a 4K monitor to replicate the original look.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        And heavy enough to seriously crush your foot (and possibly implode and electrocute you) if mishandled.

        Sometimes. Other times they were little portable things.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            1.2 kg isn’t very much, especially for a dense piece of electronics.

            If you look at the history of iMac computers, when they went from CRTs to flat screens they only dropped 6 kg from 15.7 kg to 9.6 kg. Since then they’ve focused on making them lighter and lighter, but it’s not like the CRT was the majority of the weight.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s the equivalent of knowing the difference between “poisonous” and “venomous”

          For the vast majority of people it doesn’t matter. Maybe they learned in 8th grade, but they forgot, because it never came back up.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Not really. Radiation is something you encounter every day. Radioactivity is something you probably never encounter. Most people except Australians rarely encounter poisonous and venomous animals.