What is fully human written and how are you as a human(I assume) able to distinguish between what is laboriously typed and what is generated, here lets try this exercise and see if you can spot any difference Here is a code I have typed by hand

"smash":
        push    rbp
        mov     rbp, rsp
        call    "smash"
        pop     rbp
        ret

and here is machine generated code with the prompt, the slop machine used here is a compiler

GCC take this C code void smash(){smash();} and make it executable and here is the output

"smash":
        push    rbp
        mov     rbp, rsp
        call    "smash"
        nop
        pop     rbp
        ret

On the shitpost meter, you score 70%

My mind is to ban it to preserve open source.

You will be preserving it alright, but not progressing it in anyway; A blanket ban wont really solve anything, a more sophisticated system would be a pinned comment warning of AI use, which you should eventually rescind if the author proves they have not abandoned the project when their tokens ran out

on the shitpost meter, you score 60%

on the shitpost meter, you score 75%

on the shitpost meter, you score 85%

on the shitpost meter, you score 55%