• bampop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “The race must be won at all costs. When I am god-emperor of the universe, then we can talk about curing cancer or whatever”

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    This is a solid debate post!

    AI can help a handful of researchers, already advancing cancer treatments, be more productive on path to help enrich big pharma. You or I doing it, are just as likely to be told to inject some bleech and walk it off. But cancer research “token demand” is in the low billions per year, and AI revenue under $1m, never mind any profitability.

    What politicians will pay to build and control skynet and subjugate everyone against their (and friendly Skynet) power/ambitions is in the high $Ts.

    The path to saving humanity is only through power redistribution of UBI/freedom dividends, exterminating political tolerance for national rivlaries, and Israel first loyalties. The only path to avoiding Skynet: https://naturalfinance.blogspot.com/2026/09/a-global-prosperity-manifesto.html

    AI as 3rd superpower (Paul Tudor Jones) real meaning is bond villains as 3rd superpower

    As a piece couched in US nazi empire axiomatic logic, the prescriptions are absurd idiocy:  Trump/Xi negotiations, and regulations on what AI services are sold to the public.  No limits/guardrails on Skynet/government use of AI, and bond villains internal use of models is ungovernable.  Just as nuclear proliferation policy, no one but nazi allegiants should have any power, and all lies to achieve power maximization are justified.  US regime establishment survival requires skynet/AI control over any opposition to their totalitarianist permanence.

    Bond villains are a 3rd superpower threat because they can make $Trillions building skynet/government oppression systems, and as in the movie Ex Machina, pursue power over commercial success ambitions.  Just as Epstein Mossad honeypot operations, directly targeting political loyalties, the bond villains would control all government actors through kompromat obtained by spying.  Anthropic recently SWATed an activist without providing any evidence of unpatriotic disloyalty.  Just as there is some confusion/debate over which of US and Israel is the subservient partner, the same will apply to the US - bond villain relationship.

    US nazi empire with colonies and corrupt nationalism are quick in their hysterics of the dangers of Chinese technology spying or kill switches, but dead silent on caution regarding US championed bond villain technology, or Israeli pagers.  In fact, the hysterics are propaganda to force submission to US championed bond villain technology purchases as the only viable choice.  Technology regulation is possible and a valid safeguard.  It cannot be based on ideology of good nazi champion sources vs evil nazi resistant sources.

    This last section has closed the loop on the humanist abandonment of nationalist rivalry disinformation.  Humanity in all nations prosperity is improved through trade and productivity boosts.  Freedom dividends sharing prosperity/productivity enhancements accelerates prosperity and abundance, by widespread affordability of useful/desriable abundance.  Whoever provides the best value to you is who you would want to provide that value.  This is the only escape path to skynet oppression and extermination.  AI/productivity policy promoting abundance is good for you.  AI policy certain to oppress you, with extermination as the fallback, is bad for you.

  • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    They don’t actually care about curing cancer, they just use it to justify their existence. If they did cure cancer they’d hide it or figure out how to monetize the fuck out of it.

    • SourDragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Reminds me of a two sentence horror I read a few years back:

      “I wish there was a cure for cancer!”

      “Why waste your wish on something that already exists?”

    • Sineljora@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The world’a leading oncologist lives in Cuba, and the American terrorist regime is happy to let him die there with the rest of their people and culture. Pharma execs are still sneaking into the island to interview him though. I think he did make a lung cancer vaccine recently.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Well, here’s the thing, you can’t cure cancer. Cancer is just a type of a many different things, all requiring very different avenues of potential “cure”.

      To cure cancer, like it’s a singular, is like the DNA equivalent of “finding the cure for mental illness”.

      So whenever you hear it on the forefront of something, you know it’s bullshit narrative.

    • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’ve had multiple marketing and finance professors say in class that curing cancers will destroy a multi-trillion dollar industry, the people benefiting don’t want that.

    • jimmy90@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      did you know those lovely chaps at google have already effectively solved the protein folding problem that is already leading to revolutions in medicine

      oh you didn’t know that. what does that make you

      you like revolutions don’t you? oh only bloody ones. good luck with that

      • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Wow.

        Does your whole account just exist to make shit comments (like setting up a strawman arguments you can knockdown like above) and getting downvoted?

        What a sad existence.

  • Tiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’m not a huge conspiracy guy, but I’m sorry, there is absolutely zero fucking chance there’s no cure for cancer and a dozen other things. They developed vaccinations, antibiotics, ect before the first half of the 19th century. They did this on a bunson burners and petry dishes. These pieces of shit take in BILLIONS in donations a year and have access do gene resequencers, supercomputers, and modeling programs BUT still can’t make a dent over the last 60 years. Absolute bullshit.

    • justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      that might be because controlling random genetic mutation is a bit different than exposing the body to a particular sequence…