• chewypoops@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        They were held in a poorly designed browser-based crypto wallet that only weirdos know how to use, so when normies wanted in on the get rich quick scheme, they would easily get confused and authorize third parties full access to the wallet.

    • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      I met someone once who had “invested” in these. Like, thousands of pounds. He thought he was super clever, talked down to us because we were so far out of the loop. I do wonder what happened to him. Poor guy.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    266
    ·
    4 days ago

    To be fair, nfts and vr were never forced on consumers quite like AI is. VR is incredible for certain types of gaming. NFTs are also incredible too. They allow you to quickly identify morons with disposable income.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      4 days ago

      Correct, the only idiotic thing about VR is buying your hardware from Mark Zuckerberg. As the folks in the VR community here are already aware, I got my Steam Frame the other day and basically the only reason I’ve had to take it off my face since then is because the thing has a finite battery life.

      • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s funny how people were comparing the Frame to Quest, saying it’s DOA because of the price, niche device only for a few enthusiasts.

        Meanwhile, the Frame is flying off the shelves and the waitlist seems to be twice as long as the number of the units available. :(

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          It also has the valve factor. In a landscape that consumer electronics are anti consumer, it’s more alluring to buy something you might not need if it’s not enshitified.

          For example, I don’t really need a steam controller but boy do I want one.

          • ericwdhs@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t want to sound like too much of a fanboy, but I’ve owned every first-party device of theirs so far, even the old physical Steam Link, the OG Controller, and the Vive which I count as theirs, and they’ve consistently hit the sweet spot of what I want out of hardware:

            No hostility to the user; very tinkerer friendly; a good balance of build quality, ergonomics, and features without going into diminishing returns; long-lasting software support (even the market failure of the Steam Link has recent firmware updates); forwarding wider Linux and gaming software ecosystems; etc.

            At this point, I’m just grabbing them if I have even an occasional use case for them, and I don’t regret it one bit. My Frame comes in tomorrow, and I’m very excited.

        • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s a good product that doesn’t request you to sell your soul to use it. It’s definitely expensive but for people who have that money and are into VR it’s the best thing ever.

      • BigPotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        I found a Meta Quest 2 at a thrift store for 20 bucks. It needed a new face cushion so I ordered one online and a Meta Quest 3S showed up instead.

        So, like, hopefully one day they’ll be CFW for it.

      • daq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Can you explain why you love it so much? I was going to give it away to my friend that did not win the lottery after only a day.

        Battery life is terrible. Interface outside of games is super unintuitive imnho. I still can’t figure out how to actually move the central window or right clock in desktop mode. I also can’t figure out how to install apks. I want to install android plex. And the game I had super high expectations for, the 11 table tennis is meh.

        Overall my experience has been very sweaty and frustrating. I’m genuinely curious if it really sucks or I’m just not the target audience. I really wanted to love it, but I find it not worth the money at all. Like $500 maybe would’ve been ok. To be clear, I’m very technical - both professionally and as a hobby.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          You can move the main center window and the dashboard bar by grabbing the long skinny horizontal stripe beneath either them, same as moving any other floating window. Unless you hit “float in world” on the center window the dashboard/taskbar/clock will remain pinned to the bottom of it.

          The inverse L shaped grab handle on the lower right of any window allows you to resize it. When you are holding it, pushing the analog stick forward or back will move it closer to you or farther away.

          Word on the street is that you can use FrameDrop to put .apks (and other executables) into your Frame’s library. I haven’t had occasion to try it; my main interest in onboard software has been regular productivity-ish apps that run natively in Linux. I stream actual games from my desktop PC, which is approximately three million times more powerful than the Frame itself.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      VR and AR both have massive unrealised potential. It just seems the tech isn’t quite there to break through just yet, especially for AR.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m in my 40s and I just want to let you know that people have been saying this since I was 16.

        Which is one of many reasons I’m not running out to buy a VR/AR rig.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Hard disagree on VR.

        As far as I can tell, VR is 100% fully realized. In the future, you will be able to do everything you can do in VR right now and nothing more than that, but it will be a better experience, smoother, higher res, faster frame rates.

        I think that it if there were a really compelling use case, people would put up with the current technical limitations to go do it.

        I think we’ll slowly see adoption rise as software support & comfort improve, but this is basically the VR landscape: sims, games, porn, and some creative stuff.

        I think the only really ground breaking thing would be if res became affordable enough to replace a 70" TV at a reasonable price, that–plus how much 3D kicks ass in VR–would definitely move some units.

        • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          I get nauseated very fast with a vr headset and I don’t think it will improve, there have been several generations of improvements where people have told me they are so good now, and every time I feel like crap within a minute or two.

          I think that is another major problem with vr, it’s unusable by some percentage of people that I think is significant enough to affect the market (or lack thereof).

          • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 days ago

            You’re absolutely right that is a major problem. The biggest reason is the mismatch between what your inner ear says (we are not moving) and what your eyes tell you (we are moving). I get nauseous really easily in VR.

            That said I just bought a steam frame and have had pretty good luck because of how I’m using it. It’s completely wireless and I have a large space I can use it in. So I’ve been playing things that don’t require fast movement and where you have a space to explore / move around in. This allows me to physically walk around the real room while exploring in VR. It’s made a huge difference but not everyone has the luxury of a big empty room they can use for that. I just mention this in case anyone else was like me and wants to do VR but gets nauseous easily.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yup, that’s definitely a real problem for broad adoption. Technically solvable, I think, if lag and frame rates improve enough, but I don’t know if it’s feasible, and there’s likely a bell curve where the cost to accomodate sensitive people isn’t worth it.

            It’s also possible you could train yourself to get used to it, though it might take you more time than most, but what would be a stong enough motivation to get through that? And you’d need to basically buy a VR head set and wear it a few more seconds every day until you could get some use out of it. Pretty insane ask.

            • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              It’s like chatbots, I don’t have a use case for a computer kissing my ass. People tell me “oh set it up on your home computer and VPN in and then you can confidentially tell your sycophantic chatbot to cancel the meeting”.

              I would rather just cancel the meeting?

              • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 days ago

                The chatbot is just as likely to tell you it canceled the meeting without cancelling the meeting.

                There was a recent talk by the guy that started Zoom and he was pushing an AI technology that would attend meetings for you. It was so ridiculous because the ultimate dream would be a bunch of AI chatbots attending a meeting on behalf of their operators, and what would the point of that even be?

                I think it was Angela Collier on YouTube if you want to share some rage.

                • skibidi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  My current employer is pushing AI HARD. Like “throw out old processes, 10x everything, the singularity is here so we can’t work the way we always have”.

                  The thing is, the best use case for AI I have found is replacing middle management. The bots are pretty good at summarizing a bunch of PRs and doc updates into weekly bullet point progress updates (which is 90% of how those managers are judged). I’ve flirted with the idea of making an AI team manager to replace the helicopter EMs and PMs and let the devs focus on the dev’ing.

                  That idea got shut down quite quickly… wonder why.

          • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            If you’re looking at new, a Quest 3S is the cheapest at $350, the equivalent of a Samsung UHD 55 inch TV. Not really cheap enough. But probably a VR headset is never going to be able to compete head-to-head with a TV because it has to have a higher resolution than the TV in a smaller space, so it’s always going to be more expensive. My hope is that it just gets good enough, maybe 1080p PPD equivalence while TV manufacturers keep chasing resolutions that don’t make a difference.

              • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Yeah, that was a subsidized price when Suckerberg thought we’d all be buying real estate in the metaverse or whatever… looks like the actual price of the tech is still too high.

        • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Really the best thing about AI is that it made everybody stop trying to make vr a thing as much, because you’re right, the use cases are already spelled out and it’s pretty much a dud (in terms of being shoehorned into everything).

    • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      I always thought it could be useful to use NFT as a proof of ownership in a software, for example you buy a game you get an NFT that proves your ownership, down the line you sell the game to someone else, you handover the NFT and bam you are no longer the owner. But software companies won’t use that as it would create a resale value and THEY want to sell new games not le YOU sell your games.

      • StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’ve thought about this to. I think that is the best use for them, the problem is it would require an internet connection to check the blockchain and authenticate that you still own it or it doesn’t work so it’s not ideal.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I played an MMO in 2002. People made financial transactions for things in a digital universe. That MMO shut down and the servers wiped around the time Bored Ape shit started. Made me laugh.

      But then again, Steve Bannon once made a living selling WoW gold. Shit is wild.

    • 0li0li@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Came here to say this: I get ton of enjoyment out of racing in VR. The rests is capitalism at its worst.

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Favorite VR racing game? I’ve got a couple kits but I’ve never played a racing game in VR!

        • 0li0li@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I mostly play arcade games with wheel (FFB) and vorpx. Favorite ones are Burnout Paradise, The Crew 1, Wreckfest, CarX Street and NFS Most Wanted.

          Older games tend to have compatibity issues, lackluster ffb and driving feel, and sims don’t get my blood pumping. I like to drift and speed in an open world with music, so after about 10 years of testing various games and series, those are the ones I found to work well for me, run well, have nice FFB, and not require online servers to run.

          • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Thanks a bunch! I don’t have a wheel but I’ve got a couple friends who looove theirs. I mainly played Initial D growing up, so I’d love a game that has great feedback and drifting!

            • 0li0li@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Best drift game in there is Carx Street, but it’s a bit too “sim” for me. I love it and drifting was a challenge, but it’s great!!

              That said, can’t beat the endlessly large Crew map and drift cars feel quite nice and each have their own drifting personalities. Non drift cars basically can’t drift tho…

  • BilSabab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    and every single time an idea that could’ve been genuinely worthwhile with enough time to gestate got rushed out and smothered by lame ass realization.

    • MrShankles@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Can they just get in their little fucking bunkers already, and we can seal them off? Not many guillotines required, the stupid fucks can corner themselves and rot… much easier

  • abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    The moment it was clear they couldn’t figure out what the “Next Big Thing” was they started throwing shit at the wall before going “well if we can’t find the next best thing, we’ll force it on them!”

    That’s how we got to where we are with AI.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes! Yes, please? If this is your vision of the future then I want to be left behind, playing and laughing outside with my friends and neighbours.

  • toohotforsoup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is it still possible to be in the Metaverse? Can I live my xbox360 graphics dreams and walk around the virtual McDonalds headquarters?

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    I hate the purported FOMO those bastards always promote to wide-eyed numbskulls wanting to be on the cutting edge of anything. Or mobsters wanting to get their money either laundered or splurge onto the most absurd.

    • BilSabab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      i don’t think mobsters are dumb enough to launder money with AI investments but i’m not a mobster so i don’t know how it works

  • sheetzoos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Poker in VR is social and fun. The rhythm games like Beat Saber and Pistol whip are pretty cool too.

    • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This meme isn’t a jab at VR or any other single technology, VR is a good piece of tech. But its still one of those technologies that were way overhyped by tech bro billionaires.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Like remember how that big tech company renamed itself in hopes of making its name ubiquitous with a VR world that no one really wants other than those who thought they could make boatloads of money from it?

        And I’m not saying that they are the only ones that want any VR world, I mean specially the one they were trying to build where they pretty much started with virtual real estate and ad space before even coming up with compelling reasons to use it at all. Also, the virtual reality that I’m really interested in isn’t the one where you strap screens to your face and have cameras or sensors detecting movement of specific hardware to act as input, but that’s all we have right now.

        Lol I just realized this: I’m more interested in the Sword Art Online VR world that would kill you in real life if you died in the game than I am in whatever FB was trying to make. Like if a genie or something offered me the choice between trying either of those, the metaverse would be a quick no while trying a nervegear would require some thought.

        Though not whatever comes out of Musk’s company. I have little doubt that he’s going to have at least some people working on hacking human brains, for things like mind control, finding secrets, or maybe even doing that thing where they make it look like you leave the simulated VR world but it actually just simulated taking a VR helmet off and now you’re stuck in Elon’s world until he lets you out or it breaks.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I remember playing a vr game at a frys electronics (rip) in the 90s. I have not seen a vr thing that exceeded that. They’ve gotten lighter at least, but the system they had was perfectly calibrated I guess

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Did you know they have social poker in real life?

      Social video poker, also (webcams).

      VR certainly ain’t an enabling technology for poker.

      • DireTech@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah but in the US it’s always a bunch of heavy smokers that want to play at those. Got tired of coming home and having to immediately take a shower

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        In many ways VR is a gimmick, but imo the biggest way it isn’t a gimmick is how it can emulate a sense of physical presence and make body language relevant in a way a grid of webcam feeds does not.

      • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Strap in, baby. We are going an average of 120mph+ in a Cannonball Run-style race across the USA in American Truck Simulator. Plus, I can do this irl too if you want-- hey, get the fuck back here!

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Even if every developer has a max subscription and uses it to mostly or completely automate their coding activities…how many people is that? A few hundred thousand? Where are these supposed revenues going to come from?

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Hah, and then nobody will buy it. They tried to up token prices earlier this year and were forced to go back to selling $10000 of compute for $100 in like a month because usage dropped off.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not arguing your point, but a few hundred thousand…?

      If you’re going to be making an argument, at least get the most basic of your facts right.

      Globally there are about 40-50 million software engineers. A hell of a lot more than a few hundred thousand. 1/10th of that is in the U.S.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I was guessing, sure, but apparently so were you:

        https://www.jetbrains.com/lp/devecosystem-data-playground/

        Even if the numbers are what you’re saying they are…and the same number of full-time developers transition to become full-time prompters (doubtful), and every one of them buys a $100 a month subscription that’s only 60 some odd billion a year. They’re projecting revenues to grow into the trillions per year. Literally how?

        • parrhesia@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          My clients have accountants, pms, service dept using claude too. for what I do not know. Having said that, I agree I am not sure how this money pit will make money. the plan seems to be nvidia to keep dumping money into ai companies and then the ai companies from nvidia…

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            It’s painfully obvious to me as a (reluctant) daily user of these things that most people will have no use for it.

            Maybe there are some people for whom the barrier to entry for software development was that they didn’t want to learn a programming language but were otherwise very technical and wanted to create software, but that seems like it’s a small amount of people.

            Aside from the coding itself, developing software with Claude has all of the same problems developing software without it had.

            There are also new risks to developing software with it, because among other things it further siloes developers (into teams of one + chatbot).

            • parrhesia@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m also a reluctant user as well. I just got my degree and wanted to change careers. Am now like should I put experience with claude code in my resume or not lol. Its a weird time. Id rather do everything by hand but boss wants things fast.

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I don’t think people have figured out yet that the coding was not the hard part of most software development. Maybe it is when you’re really junior or unimaginative, but it it’s more about communication issues, building the “right thing”, testing, etc. etc. forever and Claude hasn’t solved much or any of that (and has made some of it worse).