• cro_magnon_gilf@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Cars used to be made to get you somewhere. Now they cost 4 times as much and are full of government-mandated surveillance equipment and random gadgets that are expensive to fix when they break. And they’re twice as heavy.

    The only thing that’s gotten better is safety.

    I miss when cars were cars

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        The government mandates all telecommunications to be intercepted and and monitored. Car manufacturers willingly installed celluar modems in their cars for OTA updates and their own data tracking reasons… therefore, the government has surveillance equipment in your car.

      • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Maybe not govt mandated, but used by the governments. New cars have infotainment with GPS trackers, cameras etc. Toyota and Teslas were the worse from a year or two ago for selling your data to companies, especially insurance companies.

        A week ago alstate data came out that they paid millions to many apps for your phone to track you like life360, gasbuddy and so on.

        Don’t get me started on TVs. Watch gamers nexus on LG TVs. They store 4gb of data including audio, screenshots - even if it’s not connected to the internet. Doctor’s offices, companies or other places that rely on hipa or trade secrets have these TVs sitting around.

        Your wifi routers uses beam forming to track you around your house and can be accurate enough to make out complex shapes like faces.

        Anyways, I came here to say I have the same generation a4 avant with the 3.2l, I think b7. Just the right loudness exhaust from factory when you floor it and at right rpms it reverberates like a super car because of the vvt.

    • scops@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      My nephew was telling me about how he dusted off his old console and laughed at how bad the games looked. He was of course talking about his PS3.

      One of these days I need to sit him down and subject him to some early 3d games like Battle Arena Toshinden or FFVIII to give him some real pizza-face perspective.

      • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        The PS3 is of that era where there was huge hype at the time about how realistic the graphics were (deservedly, to be fair) but when you look at it historically the shortcomings are all too clear, and it’s almost comical.

        Games on older consoles couldn’t gun for realism the same way, and so they ironically look better now in retrospect because they just come across as having a particular style of their own.

        • fishy@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Even on consoles like the ps1 the games that chased “cutting edge” graphics look so much worse than games that had distinct art styles.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I will say that with a handful of exceptions the PS3 generally looks worse than the 360, for example Infamous and MGS4 still hold up well enough but Red Dead Redemption does look a good bit rougher on the PS3.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I love the styling cars had circa 2000. This whole “let’s make cars look like futuristic tanks” thing lately is not it

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s strange to live in a time where things change so much on the scale of a decade or two. Most of human existence was much more consistent. Multiple generations could come and go without much changing but the seasons.

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    I still consider electric windows to be futuristic show-off fluffery, despite not having actually seen manual winders in a few years.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It would be interesting to see a timeline of when certain features became standard. For example, pushing a button to start a car instead of turning a key. That still seems new to me, even though I’ve driven some cars with that feature that were old enough to be falling apart.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            lucky so and so. every fuckin car, from fuckers bouncing off the car while it’s parked.

            i’m a car wreck magnet. of the 20ish car “accidents” i’ve been in, i was in the passenger seat eating lunch for like 15 of them (you lose track after like number seven) i’m not the best data point

        • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Done it on a '04 Subaru, absolute pain in the ass that needs two people. Meanwhile the cranks on my '95 Mazda continue to function completely fine.

    • freebee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m reading this while sitting in a rather new electric Renault Zoë where the windows in the back are manual!

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      We have manual winders. (We down graded our car on purpose for cheaper repairs)

      I prefer winders for the front. No need for key in accessory position, and fine control.

      Back is tricky

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Electric windows go really poorly with that other pair of modern features, turney-offey-when-you-stoppey-engine (that’s the technical name) and button-make-engine-go-not-turney-key.

        I was in a car recently where I forgot to close the sunroof, and there didn’t seem to be a way to close the sunroof without re-starting the engine.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      my daily driver is a 2015 wrangler with crank windows. 158k. automatic transmission. only “big” fixes were oil cleaned housing and the latest was last month, radiator broke its seal on bottom. simple swap.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Crap, the time between when the moon landing happened and when I was born (late 80s), is smaller than the gap between 9/11 and today.

      And it always will be, by an ever-widening margin.

      … I think I gotta lie down

  • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    That audi is around 2008-2011 (15-18yrs), but one gen before that, yes 20 years old.

    And cars don’t really age that terribly anymore (at least the 1.9 TDI era). My 2002 golf is (if we ignore the reliability and the swimming pools) way better than the newer 1.6 TDIs I’ve sat in, and it will probably outlast them.

      • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Water in my boot door. Great.

        It actually leaks trough the adhesive between the glass and metal. Not really enjoyable. It sounds like a swimming pool on every road except the highways. Will have to add some silicone (or putty) to hopefully stop it (since glass reattachments are expensive.

        Also: it’s the car of the Dieselgate era. Those are (in my opinion) the strongest and most reliable diesels ever made. Maybe VW was onto something when cheating the emission tests (well probably they could just add better filters, which would make them less money), but that doesn’t make the cars bad.

  • Tomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Boxy cars looked the best.

    Lancia Delta

    Citroën AX

    Honda CRX

    Ford Escort

    Postman Pat’s Van

  • raven55six@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It is crazy how recent some of the events are that we usually consider ancient. The power of time is that you don’t realize how fast it passes.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    I drive a car from the early 2000’s. When I got it I was stoked to finally have a car made in this century. It turns 20 in 2 years 😬

  • hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    And with the current design trends You can tell, the Audi is 20 years old. I don’t know about You, but I don’t like the 2000s designs. I much prefer the current ones. Especially the EVs.

    • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I like the 2000’s era designs the most, simple, not crammed with touchscreens and curvy instead of boxy like the newer and older era cars.

      The 80’s and 90’s are also cool (like the Mercedes of the era (when it was actually more reliable and comfortable than the cheaper cars)).